Post
The genre distinction that has spawned a thousand forum arguments.
Both trace back to the 1980 game Rogue, which featured procedural generation, permadeath, and turn-based gameplay. A traditional roguelike follows these rules strictly: think ASCII dungeons where every run starts completely fresh. A roguelite keeps the procedural generation and permadeath but adds persistent progression between runs, so dying still costs you but you get a little stronger each time. Purists insist the distinction matters. Most players just want to know if their upgrades carry over.
Example
Nethack and Caves of Qud are traditional roguelikes with strict adherence to the Berlin Interpretation. Hades and Dead Cells are roguelites where permanent upgrades between runs make each attempt slightly easier. The distinction is exactly why Hades feels approachable while Nethack feels like a PhD program.
Why it matters
Understanding this distinction helps you set expectations before buying. If a game says roguelike and means it, prepare to lose everything on death. If it says roguelite, you are signing up for a progression treadmill that softens the punishment.
Related concepts